Publication

This paper explores the question of whether the single greatest barrier to progress in the quest for nuclear non-proliferation is the continued role of nuclear deterrence as an element of security thinking. The author begins by examining the counter-productive effects of deterrence as a doctrine and considers the opportunities that are blocked by deterrence. She then takes a look at what might replace deterrence as a doctrine, examines the role of language and psychology in how the UK's nuclear weapons are viewed by the public, and suggests how countries can take a more measured approach to ensuring their security without resorting to the threat of a potential nuclear response.